Advanced Search
LI Yuan, CHAI Yanhong, LIU Lanbo, MAO Zhe, ZHAI Xinhua. Research on uncertainty minimum ellipsoid envelope model of laser measurement system[J]. LASER TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 46(3): 293-300. DOI: 10.7510/jgjs.issn.1001-3806.2022.03.001
Citation: LI Yuan, CHAI Yanhong, LIU Lanbo, MAO Zhe, ZHAI Xinhua. Research on uncertainty minimum ellipsoid envelope model of laser measurement system[J]. LASER TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 46(3): 293-300. DOI: 10.7510/jgjs.issn.1001-3806.2022.03.001

Research on uncertainty minimum ellipsoid envelope model of laser measurement system

More Information
  • Received Date: May 09, 2021
  • Revised Date: June 15, 2021
  • Published Date: May 24, 2022
  • In order to effectively evaluate the three-dimensional spatial distribution of measurement errors of the laser measurement system, a new uncertainty model based on the calculation of the minimum envelope ellipsoid was proposed. Based on the measured or simulated location data, the isolated forest algorithm was introduced to filter out abnormal data in the point cloud. With the valid data, the minimum envelope ellipsoid uncertainty model was established based on the particle swarm optimization and the error ellipsoid theory. By the coordinate system transformation between the measurement field and the single point uncertainty, the minimum envelope ellipsoid model was applied to the spatial uncertainty distribution analysis. Through the test of the measured data of a single point and a 10m-level space scene, the model can efficiently screen the sampling data and perform different levels of minimum envelope ellipsoid calculations according to the requirements. And then the corresponding uncertainty can be obtained. The results show that based on the measurement position data, the model can efficiently and accurately describe the three-dimensional uncertainty range of a single point position, and can effectively reproduce the uncertainty distribution in the measurement space. With the experimental conditions of a measurement distance 4.7m, the effective data after screening 94.2%, and an envelope ratio 97.5%, an ellipsoid with an uncertainty range of three-axis length 4.95μm, 18.39μm, 30.53μm is obtained by the model calculation. The minimum envelope ellipsoid uncertainty model has important value in many aspects, such as theoretical model verification based on actual measurement, equipment state and measurement environment analysis, and measurement layout design.
  • [1]
    SWYT D A. Length and dimensional measurements at NIST[J]. Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Techno-logy, 2001, 106(1): 1-23. DOI: 10.6028/jres.106.002
    [2]
    SHI H Y, GUO T, WANG D, et al. Power line suspension point location method based on laser point cloud[J]. Laser Technology, 2020, 44(3): 364-370(in Chinese).
    [3]
    SUI Sh Ch, ZHU X Sh. Digital measurement technique for evaluating aircraft final assembly quality[J]. Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2020, 50: 1449-1460(in Chinese). DOI: 10.1360/SST-2020-0049
    [4]
    DENG Zh P, LI S G, HUANG X. Coordinate transformation uncertainty analysis and reduction using hybrid reference system for aircraft assembly[J]. Assembly Automation, 2018, 38(4): 487-496. DOI: 10.1108/AA-08-2017-097
    [5]
    MEI Z, MAROPOULOS P G. Review of the application of flexible, measurement-assisted assembly technology in aircraft manufacturing[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 2014, B228(10): 1185-1197.
    [6]
    CHEN Z H, DU F Zh, TANG X Q. Research on uncertainty in mea-surement assisted alignment in aircraft assembly[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2013, 26(6): 1568-1576. DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2013.07.037
    [7]
    DENG Zh Ch, WU Zh Y, YANG J G. Point cloud uncertainty analysis for laser radar measurement system based on error ellipsoid model[J]. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2016, 79: 78-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2015.11.010
    [8]
    COX M G, HARRIS P M. Measurement uncertainty and traceability[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2006, 17(3): 533-540. DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/17/3/S13
    [9]
    ZHANG F M, QU X H. Fusion estimation of point sets from multiple stations of spherical coordinate instruments utilizing uncertainty estimation based on Monte Carlo[J]. Measurement Science Review, 2012, 12(2): 40-45.
    [10]
    REN Y, LIN J R, ZHU J G, et al. Coordinate transformation uncertainty analysis in large-scale metrology[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2015, 64(9): 2380-2388. DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2015.2403151
    [11]
    ZHU J K, LI L J, LIN X Zh. Research on the measurement field planning of lidar measurement system[J]. Laser Technology, 2021, 45(1): 99-104(in Chinese).
    [12]
    BERGSTRÖM P, EDLUND O. Robust registration of point sets using iteratively reweighted least squares[J]. Computational Optimization and Applications, 2014, 58(3): 543-561. DOI: 10.1007/s10589-014-9643-2
    [13]
    WANG Q, HUANG P, LI J X, et al. Uncertainty evaluation and optimization of INS installation measurement using Monte Carlo method[J]. Assembly Automation, 2015, 35(3): 221-233. DOI: 10.1108/AA-08-2014-070
    [14]
    JIN Zh J, YU C J, LI J X, et al. Configuration analysis of the ERS points in large-volume metrology system[J]. Sensors, 2015, 15(9): 24397-24408. DOI: 10.3390/s150924397
    [15]
    PREDMORE C R. Bundle adjustment of multi-position measurements using the Mahalanobis distance[J]. Precision Engineering, 2010, 34(1): 113-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2009.05.003
    [16]
    CALKINS J M. Quantifying coordinate uncertainty fields in coupled spatial measurement systems[D]. Virginia, USA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2002, 1: 48.
    [17]
    LIU Y, SUN Sh Y. Laser point cloud denoising based on principal component analysis and surface fitting[J]. Laser Technology, 2020, 44(4): 497-502(in Chinese).
    [18]
    CHEN H S, MA H Zh, CHU X N, et al. Anomaly detection and critical attributes identification for products with multiple operating conditions based on isolation forest[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2020, 46: 101139. DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2020.101139
    [19]
    SUSTO G A, BEGHI A, MCLOONE S. Anomaly detection through on-line isolation Forest: An application to plasma etching[C] // Proceeding of the 28th Annual SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Ma-nufacturing Conference (ASMC). New York, USA: IEEE, 2017: 89-94.
    [20]
    LIU F T, TING K M, ZHOU Zh H. Isolation-based anomaly detection[J]. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 2012, 6(1): 1-39.
    [21]
    CHEN W R, YUN Y H, WEN M, et al. Representative subset selection and outlier detection via isolation forest[J]. Analytical Methods, 2016, 8(39): 7225-7231. DOI: 10.1039/C6AY01574C
    [22]
    KENNEDY J, EBERHART R. Particle swarm optimization[C] // Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks. New York, USA: IEEE, 1995: 1942-1948.
    [23]
    POLI R, KENNEDY J, BLACKWELL T. Particle swarm optimization[J]. Swarm Intelligence, 2007, 1(1): 33-57. DOI: 10.1007/s11721-007-0002-0
    [24]
    ALAM S, DOBBIE G, KOH Y S, et al. Research on particle swarm optimization based clustering: A systematic review of literature and techniques[J]. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 2014, 17: 1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2014.02.001
    [25]
    LI Y, XING Y, FANG C, et al. An experiment-based method for focused ion beam milling profile calculation and process design[J]. Sensors and Actuators, 2019, A286: 78-90.
    [26]
    LI Y, GOSÁLVEZ M A, PAL P, et al. Particle swarm optimization-based continuous cellular automaton for the simulation of deep reactive ion etching[J]. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2015, 25(5): 055023. DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/25/5/055023
    [27]
    CHEN S Q, ZHANG H Y, ZHAO Ch M, et al. Point cloud registration method based on particle swarm optimization algorithm improved by beetle antennae algorithm[J]. Laser Technology, 2020, 44(6): 678-683(in Chinese).

Catalog

    Article views (10) PDF downloads (17) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return